彩神大发 - -(中国)360百科

来源：彩神大发2022-04-14 17:48

努力开创甘肃农业农村现代化建设新局面******

　　甘肃日报评论员

　　刚刚召开的省委农村工作会议，深入贯彻中央农村工作会议精神，认真总结去年我省“三农”工作，部署了当前和今后一个时期“三农”工作的目标任务。这次会议，对我们锚定建设农业强省目标，扎实推进“三农”各项工作，奋力开创甘肃农业农村现代化建设新局面，具有十分重要的意义。

　　去年以来，我省坚持农业农村优先发展，统筹推进乡村“五个振兴”，加快改善农民群众生产生活条件，脱贫成果有了新提升，粮食生产实现新突破，产业发展迈出新步伐，乡村建设取得新成效，发展动能得到新激发，“三农”工作保持了持续健康发展的良好态势。全省上下要乘势而上、再接再厉，围绕建设农业强省的奋斗目标，加快农业农村现代化步伐，为全面建设社会主义现代化幸福美好新甘肃打下坚实基础。

　　今天的甘肃，“三农”工作重心已经发生历史性转移，农业产业发展进入转型升级的窗口期，乡村建设进入加快补齐短板的机遇期，城镇乡村进入协同融合发展的突破期。加快建设农业强省，我们具备诸多有利条件，拥有比较坚实的发展基础、得天独厚的资源优势、国家政策的倾斜支持、相对健全的支撑体系。但同时也要看到，我省“三农”工作仍面临诸多困难和挑战。在新征程上推进农业强省建设，必须辩证审视“三农”工作面临的形势，既看到有利条件和比较优势，又认清差距不足和短板弱项，坚定信心、主动作为，扬长补短、固强补弱。我们要立足省情农情，总结用好实践经验，把握好规律性认识和原则性要求，坚持党的全面领导，坚持以人为本，坚持改革创新，坚持系统观念，坚持因地制宜，坚持躬身实干，推动农业强省建设不断取得新突破。

　　当前和今后一个时期，做好全省“三农”工作，关键是把握好“六个聚焦”。要聚焦“守底线”，持续夯实“三农”基石，通过精准有效监测帮扶、加快脱贫地区发展、拓展协作帮扶成果，狠抓耕地提升、种子种质、大类品种、多元供给，抓好防止规模性返贫和确保粮食安全两大底线性任务；要聚焦“土特产”，持续壮大优势产业，通过挖掘“土”的资源、放大“特”的优势、提高“产”的效益，充分释放农业产业发展潜力；要聚焦“能致富”，持续拓宽增收渠道，通过强化技能培训、强化利益联结、强化政策扶持，让农民群众钱袋子鼓起来、日子越过越好；要聚焦“现代化”，持续推进乡村建设，通过积极稳妥开展村庄建设、治污治乱改善人居环境、延伸增效做好设施服务，让乡村更美丽、生活更美好；要聚焦“增活力”，持续深化改革创新，通过优化科技供给、深化农村改革、激发内生动力，不断塑造发展新动能新优势；要聚焦“强保证”，持续完善工作机制，通过健全党的领导机制、协调配合机制、干部培训机制、人才引育机制、要素保障机制、督查考核机制，为“三农”发展提供坚强保证。

　　务农重本，国之大纲。做好“三农”工作，使命光荣、责任重大。让我们锚定目标，铆足干劲，全面推进乡村振兴，加快建设农业强省，促进农业高质高效、乡村宜居宜业、农民富裕富足。

彩神大发

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.